RELIGIOUS MODERATION BASED ON SOCIO-HISTORICAL INTERPRETATION OF TOLERANT VERSES
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.34005/tahdzib.v8i2.5413Keywords:
Religious Moderation, Socio-Historical Exegesis, Tolerance, Quranic Studies, ContextualizationAbstract
This study addresses the urgency of Religious Moderation in multicultural Indonesia amidst rising cases of intolerance. The core problem lies in how to apply Socio-Historical Exegesis to re-contextualize the Quranic verses on tolerance, thereby establishing a solid theological foundation for the Religious Moderation program. The study aims to formulate an accountable and Qur'an-based theological concept of Religious Moderation. The method employs qualitative research using the Tafsir Maudhu’i (Thematic Exegesis) approach combined with Socio-Historical analysis, specifically utilizing Fazlur Rahman’s Double Movement framework on key verses (e.g., Q.S. Al-Kafirun: 6, Al-Baqarah: 256, and Mumtahanah: 8-9. The findings indicate that contextual interpretation successfully distinguishes the universal ethical message (social tolerance) from the specific historical context (theological boundary). Conclusion: Religious Moderation is not merely a political policy but an embodiment of the Quran’s essential teachings that uphold the freedom of belief and universal justice. Socio-Historical Exegesis proves capable of providing a comprehensive theological argument to counter extremist narratives.
References
The University of Chicago Press.Setara Institute. (2023). Laporan tahunan kebebasan beragama/berkeyakinan. Setara Institute for Democracy and Peace.
Mustaqim, A. (2019). Metode penelitian Al-Qur'an dan tafsir: Paradigma, aplikasi, dan tantangan kontemporer. Penerbit Idea Press. (Relevan untuk kerangka metodologi Tafsir kontemporer).
Wahid, A. & Wahid, Z. (2021). Islam, negara, dan moderasi beragama: Studi kritis kebijakan di Indonesia. LKiS Pelangi Aksara. (Analisis kritis terhadap kebijakan Moderasi Beragama).
Mujib, A., & Darmawan, U. (2017).Metode Hermeneutika Al-Qur'an: Pendekatan sosio-historis dalam menafsirkan teks suci. Pustaka Alvabet. (Fokus pada penerapan metode Sosio-Historis).Jurnal Ilmiah (Berfokus pada Tafsir, Kontekstualisasi, dan Toleransi)
Fakhrurrozi, A. (2020). Moderasi Beragama dalam Tafsir Kontemporer Indonesia: Pendekatan Kontekstual pada Ayat-Ayat Toleransi. Journal of Islamic Studies and Culture, 7(2), 145-168.
Ansori, H. (2023). Kritik Nalar Fundamentalis dan Rekonstruksi Tafsir Pluralis: Aplikasi Teori Gerak Ganda Fazlur Rahman. Hermeneutika: Jurnal Ilmu Al-Qur'an dan Tafsir, 15(1), 1-25.Hanafi, M. (2018). Genealogi Tafsir Ayat-Ayat Hubungan Antarumat Beragama dalam Konteks Indonesia. Jurnal Studi Ilmu-Ilmu Al-Qur'an dan Hadis, 19(1), 101-120.
Suhadi, M. (2022). Kontestasi Tafsir dan Ekstremisme: Menguatkan Narasi Toleransi Berbasis Maqāṣid al-Sharī‘ah. Journal of Social and Political Sciences, 6(3), 45-65.
Zulkifli, H. (2016). Kontekstualisasi Nilai-Nilai Al-Qur'an dan Hadis dalam Isu Kebangsaan: Tinjauan Tafsir Sosio-Kultural. Wawasan: Jurnal Ilmiah Agama dan Sosial Budaya, 1(2), 85-100.
Salsabila, F. (2024). Analisis Kebijakan Moderasi Beragama di Lingkungan Kampus: Kajian Empiris dan Teologis. International Journal of Islamic Thought and Civilization, 11(1), 20-38.
Rahman, F. (1982). Islam and modernity: Transformation of an intellectual tradition.
Shihab, M. Q. (2000). Membumikan Al-Qur'an: Fungsi dan peran wahyu dalam kehidupan masyarakat. Mizan.
Badri, M. (2018). The dilemma of Muslim psychologists: A critical analysis. International Institute of Islamic Thought (IIIT).
Al-Tabarī, M. b. J. (t.t.). Jāmi' al-Bayān 'an Ta'wīl Āy al-Qur'ān (ed. Dar al-Kutub al-'Ilmiyyah).
Ibn Kathīr, I. (t.t.). Tafsīr al-Qur'ān al-'Aẓīm (multiple vols; ed./pub. berbagai penerbit).
Auda, J. (2008). Maqasid al-Shariah as Philosophy of Islamic Law: A Systems Approach. International Institute of Islamic Thought.
Ibn ‘Āshūr, M. T. (2001). Maqāṣid al-Sharī‘ah al-Islāmiyyah. Dār al-Nafā’is.
Rahman, F. (1982). Islam and Modernity: Transformation of an Intellectual Tradition. University of Chicago Press.
Saeed, A. (2006). Interpreting the Qur’an: Towards a Contemporary Approach. Routledge.
Al-Suyūṭī, J. (1993). Lubāb al-Nuqūl fī Asbāb al-Nuzūl. Dār al-Kutub al-‘Ilmiyyah.
Al-Wāhidī, A. (1991). Asbāb al-Nuzūl. Dār al-Kutub al-‘Ilmiyyah.
Watt, W. M. (1974). Muhammad at Mecca. Clarendon Press.
Rippin, A. (2001). The Qur’an and Its Interpretive Tradition. Ashgate.
Khalid, Abd (2013). Legalitas Riwayat Asbab Al-Nuzul Telaah Historis Turunnya Ayat Al-Qur’an. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21580/teo.2013.24.1.319
Ibn Kathir, I. (2000). Tafsir al-Qur’an al-‘Azim. Dar al-Taybah.
Watt, W. M. (1973). Muhammad at Medina. Clarendon Press.
Al-Wahidi, A. (2001). Asbab al-Nuzul: The Circumstances of Revelation. Islamic Book Trust.
Esack, F. (1997). Qur'an, Liberation and Pluralism. Oneworld.
Ibn ‘Ashur, M. T. (2006). Maqasid al-Shariah. International Institute of Islamic Thought.
Al-Tabari, M. (2001). Jāmi‘ al-Bayān ‘an Ta’wīl Āy al-Qur’ān. Dar al-Fikr.
Ibn Kathir, I. (2000). Tafsir al-Qur’an al-‘Azim. Dar al-Taybah.
Rahman, F. (1982). Islam and Modernity: Transformation of an Intellectual Tradition. University of Chicago Press.
Ramadan, T. (2004). Western Muslims and the Future of Islam. Oxford University Press.
An-Na’im, A. A. (2008). Islam and the Secular State: Negotiating the Future of Shari‘a. Harvard University Press.
Arkoun, M. (1994). Rethinking Islam: Common Questions, Uncommon Answers. Westview Press.
Ibn ‘Ashur, Muhammad al-Tahir. (1984). Al-Tahrir wa al-Tanwir. Tunis: Dar al-Suhun.
Kementerian Agama Republik Indonesia. (2019). Moderasi Beragama. Jakarta: Badan Litbang dan Diklat.
Rahman, Fazlur. (1982). Islam and Modernity: Transformation of an Intellectual Tradition. University of Chicago Press.
Umar, Nasaruddin. (2014). Deradikalisasi Pemahaman Al-Qur’an dan Hadis. Jakarta: Elex Media Komputindo.
An-Na’im, A. A. (2008). Islam and the Secular State: Negotiating the Future of Shari‘a. Harvard University Press.
Arkoun, M. (1994). Rethinking Islam: Common Questions, Uncommon Answers. Westview Press.
Ibn ‘Ashur, Muhammad al-Tahir. (1984). Al-Tahrir wa al-Tanwir. Tunis: Dar al-Suhun.
Kementerian Agama Republik Indonesia. (2019). Moderasi Beragama. Jakarta: Badan Litbang dan Diklat.
Rahman, Fazlur. (1982). Islam and Modernity: Transformation of an Intellectual Tradition. University of Chicago Press.
Umar, Nasaruddin. (2014). Deradikalisasi Pemahaman Al-Qur’an dan Hadis. Jakarta: Elex Media Komputindo.
An-Na’im, A. A. (2008). Islam and the Secular State: Negotiating the Future of Shari‘a. Harvard University Press.
Arkoun, M. (1994). Rethinking Islam: Common Questions, Uncommon Answers. Westview Press.
Ibn ‘Ashur, Muhammad al-Tahir. (1984). Al-Tahrir wa al-Tanwir. Tunis: Dar al-Suhun.
Kementerian Agama Republik Indonesia. (2019). Moderasi Beragama. Jakarta: Badan Litbang dan Diklat.
Rahman, Fazlur. (1982). Islam and Modernity: Transformation of an Intellectual Tradition. University of Chicago Press.
Umar, Nasaruddin. (2014). Deradikalisasi Pemahaman Al-Qur’an dan Hadis. Jakarta: Elex Media Komputindo.
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Lisensi Creative Commons Atribusi 4.0 Internasional.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).



